The Memory Hole

A new investigative series applying traditional reporting methods to stories that got buried before they got properly reported.

The Memory Hole Effect

Unverified claims travel six times faster than verified information on social media. According to MIT researchers who analyzed 126,000 news stories over 12 years, stories that later proved unverifiable took about 10 hours to reach 1,500 Twitter users, versus 60 hours for verified information. Unverified claims are 70 percent more likely to be retweeted. While verified stories rarely reach more than 1,000 people, unverified claims routinely reach 10,000 to 100,000.

Meanwhile, corrections disappear into the void. A 2021 study found that only 25-35% of users who see misinformation ever see corrections, and 73% of social corrections are ignored entirely.

The acceleration of information destroys memory. In 2006, Paul Virilio wrote in Speed and Politics that when power shifts from “knowledge-power” to “moving-power,” the time for deliberation vanishes. His concept of “dromology”—the logic of speed—predicted that acceleration would make everything simultaneous, destroying the ability to distinguish between what happened and what’s happening.

Consider: In 2012, Eric Holder became the first sitting cabinet member held in criminal contempt of Congress over Operation Fast and Furious, an ATF operation that let 2,000 guns walk to Mexican cartels, resulting in the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. The story dominated headlines briefly, then vanished. Today, few remember that those guns were found at over 150 crime scenes where Mexican citizens were killed.

Or this: On January 5, 2021, someone placed pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters. The FBI has conducted over 1,000 interviews and reviewed 39,000 video files. Four years later, despite a $500,000 reward, the case remains unsolved. This story disappeared so thoroughly that when the bombs were discovered on January 6, they barely registered against the larger chaos.

Journalism and Democracy

The Memory Hole series and Hesitation Media operate from a documented premise: functioning democracies require an independent press. In New York Times v. United States (1971), Justice Hugo Black wrote: “The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government.”

History demonstrates this repeatedly. The American colonists published broadsides and newspapers attacking British rule before they declared independence. As historian David Ramsay noted: “In establishing American independence, the pen and press had merit equal to that of the sword.” The French Revolution saw over 1,300 new newspapers emerge between 1789-1799, with revolutionary journalists like Jean-Paul Marat using L’Ami du Peuple to expose counter-revolutionary plots from hiding places in the Paris sewers.

Labor movements have always created their own press. The IWW’s Industrial Worker, founded in 1907, remains one of the longest-running radical newspapers in North America. During the 1934 Minneapolis truckers’ strike, workers published The Organizer, America’s first daily strike newspaper. By 1925, The American Labor Press Directory listed 629 labor newspapers, from AFL union weeklies to socialist monthlies published in 19 languages.

As former Black Panther David Hilliard explained: “We knew from the beginning how critical it was to have our own publication, to set forth our own agenda for freedom, to raise political consciousness, to rebut government lies, to tell the truth.”

Rebuilding From First Principles

The concept of the Fourth Estate, the press as an independent check on the three branches of government, has been traced to multiple origins. Thomas Carlyle, writing in 1840, attributed the phrase to Edmund Burke, claiming Burke said during a 1787 parliamentary debate: “There were three estates in Parliament; but, in the Reporters’ Gallery yonder, there sat a fourth estate more important far than they all.” However, historians debate whether Burke actually said this, suggesting Carlyle may have confused Burke with Thomas Macaulay or others who wrote about the press’s growing power. Regardless, these principles are foundational to the methodology of Hesitation Media at large.

The philosophical foundations of press freedom were articulated by John Stuart Mill in On Liberty (1859), where Mill argued that truth emerges through competition between ideas—that “the collision of truth with error” produces clearer understanding. Though Mill never used the phrase “marketplace of ideas,”that was coined by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in his 1919 dissent in Abrams v. United States, his work established the principle that free expression enables the discovery of truth.

These principles manifest in specific professional practices. The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics states journalists should “Provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate” and “Be Accountable and Transparent,” emphasizing that “Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one’s work and explaining one’s decisions to the public.” The code identifies four foundational principles: Seek Truth and Report It, Minimize Harm, Act Independently, and Be Accountable and Transparent.

In The Elements of Journalism, Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel identify verification as journalism’s essential discipline: “The discipline of verification is what separates journalism from other forms of communication such as propaganda, advertising, fiction, or entertainment.” They describe it as a “scientific-like approach” built on three core concepts: transparency (show your work so readers can decide for themselves), humility (acknowledge what you don’t know), and originality (do your own reporting).

The Fourth Estate Today

The tension between journalism’s watchdog ideal and its actual practice has been documented extensively. In Manufacturing Consent (1988), Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky argued that “contrary to the usual image of the news media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous in their search for truth,” mainstream media often “defend the economic, social, and political agendas of the privileged groups that dominate domestic society.”

Their propaganda model identified five filters that shape news:

1. Ownership and profit orientation

2. Advertiser funding as primary revenue source

3. Reliance on official sources for information

4. “Flak” and pressure from powerful interests

5. Dominant ideologies (originally anti-communism, now often terrorism or other threats)

This analysis challenges the traditional Fourth Estate concept—the idea that journalism serves as an independent check on power. As documented by Chomsky, “The mass media serve as a system for communicating messages and symbols to the general populace...In a world of concentrated wealth and major conflicts of class interest, to fulfill this role requires systematic propaganda.”

Yet the principles themselves, verification, transparency, accountability, remain vital tools for journalists seeking to fulfill that watchdog role, even within constrained systems. As Kovach and Rosenstiel argue, “A more conscious discipline of verification is the best antidote to the old journalism of verification being overrun by a new journalism of assertion.”

Columbia Journalism Review found in 2023 that major outlets violated their own standards for anonymous sources during the Trump-Russia coverage. Bob Woodward told CJR the coverage “wasn’t handled well” and readers had been “cheated.”

When outlets use phrases like “baseless claims” or “without evidence” before presenting information, they’re performing what journalism scholars call “strategic rituals,” linguistic patterns that signal authority rather than provide verification. When they write “experts say” without naming the experts, they violate the transparency principle established in these professional codes.

The Memory Hole series returns to these documented principles: verification through primary sources (as Kovach and Rosenstiel prescribe), transparency through named attribution (as the SPJ Code requires), and trust in what the 1947 Hutchins Commission called the public’s “right to know.”

Memory Hole Volume 1

These verification principles: examining primary sources, questioning official narratives, documenting discrepancies— guide our first investigation into a claim that challenges the accepted timeline of the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections saga: that intelligence operations against the Trump campaign began not in July 2016, but in late 2015, directed by CIA Director John Brennan rather than the FBI.

The accepted narrative of 2016 election interference, as established by the Mueller Report, congressional investigations, and mainstream coverage, follows this timeline: Russia began hacking Democratic emails in March 2016, Trump advisor George Papadopoulos learned about the emails on April 26, Papadopoulos told an Australian diplomat on May 10, WikiLeaks released the stolen emails starting July 22, and the FBI opened its investigation on July 31 after Australia reported Papadopoulos’s May revelation. This sequence: hack, inform, leak, investigate, forms the foundation of how we understand what happened.”

The Durham Report states the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016. The Inspector General’s 2019 report confirms this date. Major outlets from The New York Times to The Washington Post report July 31, 2016 as when surveillance of the Trump campaign began.

The declassified documents suggest a more complex timeline than the official July 31, 2016 start date. The January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment states that Russia conducted cyber operations against U.S. political institutions in “2015-2016,” though it doesn’t specify which activities occurred when. FBI texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page from December 28, 2015, show Page asking Strzok: “You get all our oconus lures approved?”—FBI terminology for overseas counterintelligence operations. However, the Inspector General’s 2019 report found no evidence that individuals associated with the Trump campaign were targeted by informants before Crossfire Hurricane began.

The chronological questions remain: What were the “oconus lures” referenced in December 2015? Which “2015-2016” cyber operations did the IC document? These gaps in the timeline require further investigation through FOIA requests and congressional oversight.

In September 2025, anti-war journalist Scott Horton cited these documents on the Daniel Davis / Deep Dive podcast, arguing they prove CIA Director John Brennan initiated operations against Trump eight months before the FBI’s official start date. Horton pointed to Brennan’s own Congressional testimony where he acknowledged passing intelligence to the FBI about “contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign” that he became aware of in 2016.

Horton’s claim centers on this timeline: the December 2015 “oconus lures” text, the IC’s reference to “2015-2016” operations, and the eight-month gap before the FBI’s official July 2016 start date. The documentary record shows activity before July 2016. What that activity was—and whether it targeted Trump—is what this investigation examines.

State of Memory Hole 1

A master timeline documents over 60 verified events from 2015 to 2025, each sourced to primary documents—congressional testimony, inspector general reports, court filings, official government releases.

The timeline shows:

Pre-July 2016 Activity:

• December 28, 2015: FBI texts show Lisa Page asking Peter Strzok: “You get all our oconus lures approved?”—FBI terminology for overseas counterintelligence operations. Senate-released texts, page 31

• January 2016: Declassified Durham annex references intercepted memorandum mentioning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Leonard Benardo (Soros Foundation), and Jeffrey Goldstein. Durham assessed these as “likely Frankenstein fabrications” by Russian intelligence

• March 2016: Second intercepted memorandum in Durham annex alleging Clinton campaign plan to link Trump to Russia—same Russian fabrication concerns per Washington Post

• April 2016: Clinton campaign and DNC hire Fusion GPS through law firm Perkins Coie for opposition research. CNN, FEC fines

The Critical Week:

• July 26, 2016: CIA received intelligence about alleged Clinton campaign plan to tie Trump to Russia. Durham Report via CNN

• July 31, 2016: FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Durham Report page 52, DOJ IG Report

• August 3, 2016: CIA Director Brennan briefed President Obama on Clinton plan intelligence. Durham Report, confirmed by CNN

The Weiner Laptop Delay:

• September 28-29, 2016: FBI learns of 300,000+ Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop “within hours” of obtaining devices. NY FBI notifies McCabe, Strzok, Priestap. DOJ IG Report

• October 3-4, 2016: FBI leadership aware but took “no evidence that anyone... took any action” until late October. DOJ IG Report, Slate analysis

• October 28, 2016: Comey reopens Clinton investigation 11 days before election. NPR

The Leak Contradiction:

• May 3, 2017: Comey testifies to Senate Judiciary: Never authorized anyone at FBI to be anonymous source. Sen. Cruz statement

• April 13, 2018: DOJ IG finds McCabe “lacked candor” about authorizing October 2016 WSJ leak. McCabe says he told Comey; Comey says McCabe didn’t. NBC News

• September 30, 2020: Comey stands by his 2017 testimony when Cruz confronts him about McCabe contradiction. ABC News, Rev transcript

The Declassified Evidence:

• July 31, 2025: Durham annex declassified by AG Bondi, FBI Director Patel, CIA Director Ratcliffe. Claim: Found in “FBI burn bags.” Sen. Grassley

• September 24, 2025: News breaks of potential Comey charges for false statements to Congress. 5-year statute expires September 30. CNN

The documentary record shows FBI activity before July 31, 2016. The December 2015 “oconus lures” text proves overseas operations were approved seven months before the official start date. Whether these operations targeted Trump—as Horton claims—or were unrelated requires examining what these documents actually say versus what they prove.

Why it Matters

In 2022, the Reuters Institute Digital News Report found that 42% of Americans actively avoid news sometimes or often, up from 38% in 2017. The primary reason cited: exhaustion with the amount of coverage and difficulty determining what’s factual.

In December 2024, Pew Research Center found that 77% of Americans believe news organizations favor one side when presenting news on political and social issues. Only 22% say news organizations deal fairly with all sides.

The Columbia Journalism Review’s 2023 investigation documented how major outlets violated their own standards during Trump-Russia coverage. The New York Times and Washington Post relied on anonymous sources without following their own verification protocols. Bob Woodward told CJR the coverage “wasn’t handled well” and readers had been “cheated.”

MIT researchers analyzing 126,000 news stories over 12 years found that false news stories spread six times faster than true stories on Twitter. False claims reached 1,500 people in 10 hours versus 60 hours for verified information. While verified stories rarely reached more than 1,000 people, false claims routinely reached 10,000 to 100,000.

A 2020 study in Science Advances tracked corrections on social media and found that only 50% of users who shared false information saw corrections, and only 5.5% of those deleted their original posts. The Journal of Experimental Psychology found in 2022 that false information continues to influence beliefs even after correction—what researchers call the “continued influence effect.”

When Gallup polling in October 2024 found American trust in mass media at 31%—the third lowest in history—the breakdown showed: 54% of Democrats trust media, 27% of independents, and 12% of Republicans. The trust gap between parties reached 42 points, the widest ever recorded.

The Investigation Ahead

The investigation as a whole tests Scott Horton’s claim that CIA operations against Trump began in late 2015, eight months before the FBI’s official July 31, 2016 start date. The December 28, 2015 “oconus lures” text provides a starting point. The Senate-released documents show FBI overseas operations approved seven months before Crossfire Hurricane.

The method follows four tracks:

Hypothesis Testing: Can documentary evidence support pre-July 2016 operations targeting Trump?

Timeline Verification: Over 60 events from 2015-2025, each linked to congressional testimony, inspector general reports, or declassified documents. When the timeline shows the CIA received Clinton plan intelligence on July 26, 2016, and the FBI opened its Trump investigation on July 31, 2016, that five-day gap requires examination.

Source Mapping: The Clinton campaign paid Perkins Coie $1.02 million. Perkins Coie paid Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS paid Christopher Steele $168,000. The money trail is documented in FEC filings and congressional reports.

Contradiction Documentation: When Comey testifies he never authorized FBI leaks and McCabe says Comey knew about them, both testimonies get equal presentation. The DOJ Inspector General found McCabe “lacked candor.” Comey stood by his testimony in 2020.

The first installment examines December 2015 through July 2016. The second tracks the Weiner laptop delay—why the FBI waited from September 29 to October 28, 2016 to act on 300,000 Clinton emails. The third analyzes the leak contradiction between Comey and McCabe.

Each installment provides documents. Readers evaluate the evidence. Join us for the ride!

Here are your references in APA 7 format:

Receipts

ABC News. (2025, September 26). Federal probe into James Comey centers around 2020 Senate testimony: Sources. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/federal-probe-james-comey-centers-2020-senate-testimony/story?id=125935493

Carlyle, T. (1840). On heroes, hero-worship, and the heroic in history. James Fraser.

CBS News. (2017, November 2). Report: Fusion GPS paid Steele $168,000 to work on Trump dossier. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-fusion-gps-paid-steele-168000-to-work-on-trump-dossier/

CNN. (2022, March 30). Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC fined by FEC over Trump-Russia dossier research. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/30/politics/clinton-dnc-steele-dossier-fusion-gps

CNN. (2023, May 15). Takeaways from special counsel John Durham’s report on FBI’s Russia-Trump probe. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/15/politics/durham-report-takeaways/index.html

CNN. (2025, September 24). DOJ nearing decision whether to charge former FBI Director James Comey with lying to Congress. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/24/politics/james-comey-justice-department-lying-to-congress

Columbia Journalism Review. (2023, January 30). The press versus the president, part one. https://www.cjr.org/special_report/trumped-up-press-versus-president-part-1.php

Cruz, T. (n.d.). Sen. Cruz calls on DOJ, FBI to provide transparency to James Comey & Andrew McCabe’s contradictory testimony. https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-calls-on-doj-fbi-to-provide-transparency-to-james-comey-and-andrew-mccabe-and-039s-contradictory-testimony

Department of Justice. (2023, May 12). Report on matters related to intelligence activities and investigations arising out of the 2016 presidential campaigns. https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf

Department of Justice Office of Inspector General. (2018, June 14). DOJ OIG releases report on various actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in advance of the 2016 election. https://oig.justice.gov/news/doj-oig-releases-report-various-actions-federal-bureau-investigation-and-department-justice

Department of Justice Office of Inspector General. (2019, December 9). Review of four FISA applications and other aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation. https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Gallup. (2024, October 14). Americans’ confidence in media remains at historic low. https://news.gallup.com/poll/651977/americans-confidence-media-remains-historic-low.aspx

Gerth, J. (2023, January 30). The press versus the president. Columbia Journalism Review. https://www.cjr.org/special_report/trumped-up-press-versus-president-part-1.php

Grassley, C. (2025, July 31). Newly declassified appendix to Durham Report sheds additional light on Clinton campaign plan to falsely tie Trump to Russia and FBI’s failure to investigate. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/newly-declassified-appendix-to-durham-report-sheds-additional-light-on-clinton-campaign-plan-to-falsely-tie-trump-to-russia-and-fbis-failure-to-investigate

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.

Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Crown Publishers.

Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. John W. Parker and Son.

MIT News. (2018, March 8). Study: On Twitter, false news travels faster than true stories. https://news.mit.edu/2018/study-twitter-false-news-travels-faster-true-stories-0308

NBC News. (2018, April 13). Internal investigation hits McCabe for misleading statements. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/internal-investigation-hits-mccabe-misleading-statements-n865811

New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713

NPR. (2016, October 28). FBI led back to Clinton email server case by Anthony Weiner investigation. https://www.npr.org/2016/10/28/499770889/anthony-weiner-investigation-leads-fbi-back-to-clinton-email-server-case

Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (2017, January 6). Assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent US elections. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022). Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation. Nature Communications, 13(1), 1-12.

Pew Research Center. (2024, December 3). Americans’ views of whether news organizations are biased. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2024/12/03/americans-views-of-whether-news-organizations-are-biased/

Ramsay, D. (1789). The history of the American Revolution. R. Aitken & Son.

Reuters Institute. (2022). Digital news report 2022: United States. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022/united-states

Rev. (2020, September 30). James Comey testimony on Russia investigation transcript. https://www.rev.com/transcripts/james-comey-testimony-on-russia-investigation-transcript-september-30

Rolling Stone. (2025, August 1). Durham annex ‘evidence’ was likely made up by Russia. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/durham-annex-evidence-likely-made-up-russia-1235398702/

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. (2018). Appendix C - Documents. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Appendix%20C%20-%20Documents.pdf

Slate. (2018, June 15). The FBI ignored Anthony Weiner’s laptop. That may have cost Hillary Clinton the election. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/fbi-ignored-anthony-weiners-laptop-and-it-may-have-cost-hillary-clinton-the-election.html

Society of Professional Journalists. (2014). SPJ code of ethics. https://spj.org/ethicscode.asp

Virilio, P. (2006). Speed and politics (M. Polizzotti, Trans.). Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1977)

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.

Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85(3), 423-441.

Washington Post. (2025, August 1). Declassified report: FBI never verified alleged Clinton plan to link Trump and Russia. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/07/31/durham-report-declassified-trump-clinton-russia/